Thank you Steve and your Guides!
*** gavin
How Do We Know We Can Trust the Galactics? – Part 1
Billy Meier meets Semjase: trustworthy?
A reader has asked how we know that we can trust the galactics. How do we comfortably determine for ourselves that they are worthy of our trust?
Please know that this is in many ways an unanswerable question. No matter what I say here, whether one trusts another is not something that can be forced, pre-determined, made to happen, etc.
Whether one trusts, similar to whether one loves, is an individual matter and conforms to no such rules, as, say, that which determines under what conditions hydrogen will combine with oxygen to form water.
So the answer to this question could go on for pages and pages and still would not influence anyone necessarily to trust.
And, in fact, some people who are deeply skeptical might enjoy asking others to induce them to trust and then hold out. Their response may be something like: “See? You thought you could make me trust. But I’m still skeptical.”
So neither I nor anyone else can make you trust. And that needs to be understood from the outset.
But I can give some suggestions about why many people have said they trust the galactics currently around the planet, as opposed to those who were here decades ago and abducted and did bad things to people.
How We Feel in Their Presence
How many stories have we read where someone comes into the presence of a saint like Mata Amritanandamayi or Papa Ramdas and are overwhelmed by the love they feel? I remember interviewing the
Divine Mother for An Hour with an Angel and being overwhelmed by the bliss I felt fully an hour and a half prior to the interview. Both Linda (the channel) and I had to lie down afterwards because we were both overcome by bliss.
Bliss is a quality of the divine. It cannot be manufactured. It cannot be induced in someone, perhaps apart from some exotic chemicals that I’m not familiar with. But we do tend to surrender to the experience of it because it shows up like everything we’ve always wanted. I once spent three days in bliss after a vision and nothing more could have been added to the experience to make it better. It was complete in itself and I was the happiest man alive.
The point of my saying this is that the galactics around the Earth are ascended beings, many like Ashtar and Sanat Kumara from beyond the twelve dimensions associated with human life. If we were in their presence we’d feel love and bliss and this is what would in a sense identify them as benign beings and trustworthy. One cannot live in a state of bliss and transgress. If one did, one would lose the bliss. If one could, Ascension would not be the goal we seek. We’d be seeking something else. Ascension would not offer us what we want, which is a more evolved, spiritually-beneficent life filled with bliss.
So the first answer to the question of how do we know we can trust the galactics is that our response in their presence should tell us. Being in the presence of an ascended galactic will bring us the experience of bliss and that cannot be falsely manufactured. Trust the love and the bliss you feel. It’s their calling card.
That’s why SaLuSa says: “If you could glimpse such levels [as will be available on Ascension] you would see out the remainder of your time in a joyous state, without fearing the future that is opening up to you. Far from it, you would be euphoric and know beyond doubt that it has been divinely decreed, and that no mortal can prevent your fulfilment.” (1)
Or: “[Our ships] are alive with the higher vibrations of love, and visitors seldom want to leave the harmony, joy and happiness that they feel all around. Unlike Earth there is no negativity or lower vibrations, as we have moved far beyond them.” (2)
Or Hatonn speaking of all souls, galactic and terrestrial, at Matthew Ward’s level of evolution: “All souls at Matthew’s station are highly-spiritually evolved, and as their spokesperson, he relays their unified feelings about souls on Earth. They love all equally and send healing light to all. They are able to honor all people as parts of God and separate that from their ungodly thoughts and actions.” (3)
Let me leave off now and return to the next part of the subject tomorrow.
by Steve Beckow
Footnotes
(1) SaLuSa, Oct. 7, 2009, at http://www.treeofthegoldenlight.com/First_Contact/Channeled_Messages_by_Mike_Quinsey.htm(2) SaLuSa, 17 October 2008.
(3) Hatonn in Matthew’s Message, Oct. 10, 2010.
http://the2012scenario.com/2012/07/how-do-we-know-we-can-trust-the-galactics-part-1/
============================================
How Do We Know We Can Trust the Galactics? – Part 2
The galactics promised to end weather warfare and I think they have
Continuing from yesterday, how else do we know that we can trust the galactics?
Their Track Record
So much of what the galactics have done has to be inferred. And it is inferred on the basis of what they say is true and a comparison of what they say with what we know has occurred. We should note that what they say is not what the cabal says. The cabal doesn’t say that they’ve ended chemtrails. They wouldn’t acknowledge that chemtrails exist. But the galactics do say that they’ve ended chemtrails and we have the evidence of our senses to prove that this is indeed the case; chemtrails appear to have ended.
The cabal doesn’t say that they’ve ended the use of HAARP and other weather-warfare weapons. They don’t acknowledge that they use them. But the galactics do say that they’ll end their use. And in fact in the last nine months we’ve had very little activity that I’m aware of that could be traced to weather-warfare weapons.
In previous years, Dutch Sinse showed us many ways to track the use of HAARP. Never did the cabal say: “Here is how you can track the use of HAARP.” And the galactics told us what they were doing about the use of HAARP and by consulting the record of weather events, and “natural” disasters like earthquakes and hurricanes and volcanoes, one can see that a greater amount of peace has descended on the Earth recently than at any time within my memory anyways.
The galactics have lived up to their promises. The cabal made no promises in this area but were seen to be the deliverers of doom through their weather-warfare weapons, pandemics, chemtrails, etc.
Now extend this to other areas: No nuclear weapons have been exploded on the Earth. No World War III has occurred despite the cabal’s clear attempts to extend war to Iran, after having devastated Afghanistan and Iraq for no reason save empire-building. Various attempts to launch pandemics have been thwarted. Various attempts to perpetrate false-flag attacks have been defeated.
So how can we know to trust the galactics? Well, the second reason would be to look at their track record. What have they promised and what have they delivered? No matter what area you look at in which they have given promises, I think you can see that they have delivered.
Let’s listen to some of their statements (or those of others who look at the galactics) on these matters:
SaLuSa: “There are restraints [against
the Dark] and we can for example refer to the divine edict, that no
military power will be allowed to use nuclear weapons, or start World
War Three.” (1)
SaLuSa: Be assured you are safe from any attempt to create a major incident that will give the dark ones more power over you. (2)
Ker-On: The line has been drawn against
certain activities that would endanger life on and beyond your Earth,
and [the dark] are therefore curtailed in what they can do. (3)
Matthew Ward: “But, just as in the previous flu situations, the technology
of our universal family has neutralized the swine flu virus-laden
vaccines and will continue to do so as long as the makers persist in
their scheme. And please have no worries about programmed microchips
being implanted via inoculations—if that is attempted, the programming
will be erased by that same technology.” (4)
SaLuSa: “We of the Galactic Federation
are closely monitoring activity on Earth, as Mother Earth needs to
pursue her own cleansing program. She is very much like you in the sense
that she also has to shed that which cannot go through to the higher
dimensions. … All changes will occur with as little harm to you as
possible, and we can warn you of where the most danger exists. We will
be working behind the scenes to lessen the impact of them where
permissible. There are minor changes occurring on the Earth’s surface
all of the time, and these are quite natural and usually present little
danger.” (5)
SaLuSa: “Chemtrails are more an attack on
your health but are not without their effect on your mind. As we
recently mentioned, these are being cleared away so that now they have
little affect upon you.” (6)
Where do you hear the dark cabal saying these things? Therefore whom can you trust? Well, I think that, on the basis of their track record, we can trust the galactics. It’s they who’ve turned our situation around and saved us from harm at the hands of the cabal.
I’ll look at a third area in the next installment.
by Steve Beckow
Footnotes
(1) SaLuSa, June 27, 2011, at http://www.treeofthegoldenlight.com/First_Contact/Channeled_Messages_by_Mike_Quinsey.htm(2) SaLuSa, Jan. 1, 2010.
(3) Ker-On of Venus, Oct. 22, 2008, at http://www.treeofthegoldenlight.com/First_Contact/Channeled_Messages_by_Mike_Quinsey.htm
(4) Matthew’s Message, Sept. 21, 2009, at http://www.matthewbooks.com/mattsmessage.htm
(5) SaLuSa, Oct. 18, 2010.
(6) SaLuSa, July 15, 2011.
http://the2012scenario.com/2012/07/how-do-we-know-we-can-trust-the-galactics-part-2/
=============================
And the third way in which we can know that we can trust the galactics is to look at who trusts them, who works with them, and who urges us to trust them.
But here we encounter anomalies which show us that terminology like “galactics” is in the end meaningless.
For instance, Sanat Kumara, known to many spiritual traditions as Quetzcoatl, the Ancient of Days, Skandha, Subramanya, Ahuramazda, etc. He is the planetary logos for Earth.
And yet he comes from Venus in a higher dimension. Is he not an extraterrestrial? We had this interesting discussion on An Hour with an Angel that illustrates how often it’s meaningless to use a distinction like “extraterrestrial” in a unitive, multi-dimensional world.
Steve Beckow: Before we begin, can I just
confirm for our listeners that you were known to ancient Persians as
Ahura Mazda, ancient Hebrews as the Ancient of Days, and ancient Hindus
as Subramanya. Is that correct?
Sanat Kumara: Yes, that’s correct.
SB: And you consider Venus in a higher dimension as your home, do you not?
SK: That is correct. …
SB: Well, if I could just make a point for our listeners, we have a television program called Ancient Aliens
which says that when some extraterrestrials came to Earth they were
treated as gods. In a certain sense, you could be pointed to as an
example of this, could you not? You came to Earth from Venus, and you
were looked upon as a god.
SK: Yes. Yes. … But let me be very clear. I do not present myself as a god.
SB: No, I understand that, but I’m just trying to illustrate that point about what Ancient Aliens is saying. (1)
So is the ruler of this planet a terrestrial or an extraterrestrial?
Are most of us who read this extraterrestrials? As starseeds, we come from other planets. Many people on Earth have had lifetimes on other planets. Are they extraterrestrials?
If I were to say that Sananda overlit Jesus during the latter’s ministry, I would again be referring to what we would consider an extraterrestrial, because Sananda is also from higher-dimensional Venus.
If Jesus trusted Sananda, is it not safe for us to do so as well?
Among the supposedly terrestrial saints who recommend the galactics is Saul, who is the higher aspect of the one who was St. Paul. Matthew Ward, who I’m led to believe comes from a high dimension, recommends the galactics as well. And we could point to all the ascended masters who are regularly asking us to cooperate with our stars brothers and sisters: Hilarion, St. Germain, Melchizedek, Serapis Bey, El Morya, Dhjwal Khul, etc.
And how could I forget the constant blandishments of the one I serve, Archangel Michael, and the other archangels?
So the third reason why we might be persuaded to trust the galactics is to harken to those who invite us to trust them.
There is also a fourth reason and I’ll touch on that tomorrow.
by Steve Beckow
Footnotes
(1) “Sanat Kumara on the Purpose of Life, the Universal Law, and the Longing for Liberation,” at http://the2012scenario.com/2012/06/sanat-kumara-on-the-purpose-of-life-the-universal-law-and-the-longing-for-liberation/http://the2012scenario.com/2012/07/how-do-we-know-we-can-trust-the-galactics-part-3/
=====================================
How Do We Know We Can Trust the Galactics? – Part 4
Representations of the heart differ in different cultures
The fourth way that we can know whether or not we should trust the galactics is perhaps the most confirming and affirming of all and that is by asking our heart or inner voice for its verdict. But to say why that is so, I have to say something about the heart or inner voice and about when its evidence is strong and when weak.
And please understand that this is very difficult for me because I’m not an enlightened person or a spiritual teacher. I’m not trying to represent myself as if I am and not trying to climb up on a pedestal. But I won’t allow those considerations to prevent me from discussing the matter nonetheless, from the little I know of it from experience.
What is the heart? Perhaps this would be a good place to look a little more deeply into what the heart actually is, if you’d permit me.
It isn’t a physical organ that pumps blood. It isn’t the heart chakra. The hridayam or spiritual heart is in fact the portal between the physical form and the soul. And, as far as I know, the soul is a portion of the Divine which, like a hologram, has everything in it that the Divine could be said to have in It.
The world’s great religions testify to the fact that God is to be found in the lotus of the heart or Hridayam:
Upanishads: “The ancient, effulgent being, in-dwelling Spirit, [is] deep-hidden in the lotus of the heart.” (1)
Upanishads: “Within the city of Brahman
[God], which is the body, there is the heart, and within the heart there
is a little house. This house has the shape of a lotus, and within it
dwells that which is to be sought after, inquired about, and realized.”
(2)
Shankara: “Here, within this body, in the
pure mind, in the secret chamber of intelligence, in the infinite
universe within the heart, the Atman [soul] shines in its captivating
splendour, like a noonday sun.” (3)
Habbakuk: “The Lord is in his holy temple [of the heart]: let all the earth keep silence before him.” (4)
Al-Ghazzali: “The first step to
self-knowledge is to know that thou art composed of an outward shape,
called the body, and an inward entity called the heart, or soul. By
‘heart’ I do not mean the piece of flesh situated in the left of our
bodies, but that which uses all the other faculties as its instruments
and servants. In truth it does not belong to the visible world, but to
the invisible, and has come into this world as a traveller visits a
foreign country for the sake of merchandise, and will presently return
to its native land. It is the knowledge of this entity and its
attributes which is the key to the knowledge of God.” (5)
God-realization or Brahmajnana sees the heart open up and close again; mukti, liberation or sahaja samadhi sees the heart open and remain open, says Sri Ramana Maharshi:
“[The] Heart is the seat of Jnanam [wisdom] as well as of the granthi
(knot of ignorance). It is represented in the physical body by a hole
smaller than the smallest pin-point, which is always shut. When the mind
drops down in Kevalya Nirvikalpa [samadhi or God-Realization], it opens but shuts again after it. When sahaja [nirvikalpa samadhi] is attained it opens for good.” (6)
In my view, when we connect to our hearts, what we hear is what many call our Higher Self, soul, Atman – you can call it by many names. And this source does not lie.
However, whether the voice of that source, when consulted is weak or strong, depends on how often we seek its counsel and how well we listen to it.
If we consult it often and in fact make no important decision without consulting it, I think its voice is strong.
So in what I’m about to say, please consider it understood that I’m speaking to the one who consults it often and follows its counsel.
For me, the ultimate test of whether the galactics are trustworthy is supplied by the heart, the inner voice, or Higher Self.
Matthew Ward is known for saying so often: “Follow your heart in those matters. … Trust your intuition, the messages from your soul to your consciousness.” (7) “Simply by following your heart, the seat of the soul, you are serving the light and fulfilling the lifetime purpose you signed up for!” (8)
But following this counsel and relying on it is something that will prove most successful for those who have well-ploughed this row. The skeptical among us will say “I consulted my heart and heard nothing” and so it undoubtedly will be.
That doesn’t prove this method wrong but only reveals that we haven’t developed it to the place where it can assist us.If we haven’t developed our connection with the heart, if we want to answer the question whether we should and can trust the galactics, we might be better advised to fall back on the other methods.
So these are the ways known to me that can help us decide whether we should be trusting the galactics or not. I rely the most on following my heart or inner voice.
I hope I answered the original reader’s question.
by Steve Beckow
Footnotes
(1) Swami Prabhavananda and Frederick Manchester, trans., The Upanishads. Breath of the Eternal. New York and Scarborough: New American Library, 1957; c1948, 17.(2) Ibid., 74.
(3) Shankara in Swami Prabhavananda and Christopher lsherwood, Shankara’s Crest-Jewel of Discrimination. Hollywood: Vedanta Press, 1975; c1947, 53.
(4) Habakkuk 2:20.
(5) Al-Ghazzali, The Alchemy of Happiness. trans. Claud Field. Lahore: ASHRAF, 1971; c1964., 21.
(6) Ramana Maharshi in S.S. Cohen, Guru Ramana. Memories and Notes. 6th edition. Tiruvannamalai: Sri Ramanasramam, 1993, 96.
(7) Matthew’s Message, Aug. 29, 2008, at http://www.matthewbooks.com/mattsmessage.htm
(8) Matthew’s Message, May 21, 2008.
http://the2012scenario.com/2012/07/how-do-we-know-we-can-trust-the-galactics-part-4/
No comments:
Post a Comment